Hello,
Here is my evaluation of Hendrik's work.
In this video the reasoner expose clearly his purpose. Hendrik wants to give recommendations on how to reduce stress in stressful situations.
The question at issue is also well and clearly stated. The question and purpose are directly relevant to each other. The question here is "How can we manage to make stressful situations less painful?".
Hendrik cites relevant evidence, numbers, and informations essential to the issue.
He considers many relevant points of view and gives a solution appllicable to all.
In conclusion, I think Hendrik did well on many critical thinking concepts.
(93 words)
Here is my evaluation of Hendrik's work.
In this video the reasoner expose clearly his purpose. Hendrik wants to give recommendations on how to reduce stress in stressful situations.
The question at issue is also well and clearly stated. The question and purpose are directly relevant to each other. The question here is "How can we manage to make stressful situations less painful?".
Hendrik cites relevant evidence, numbers, and informations essential to the issue.
He considers many relevant points of view and gives a solution appllicable to all.
In conclusion, I think Hendrik did well on many critical thinking concepts.
(93 words)
Hi Hendrik,
I would like to thank you for your work.
You are respecting the critical thinking process. Every steps are easily understandable and clear. All of them have a purpose and are based on information. These points are also conclued and you think about the implications behind them.
Best regards,
Matthieu Denizot
I would like to thank you for your work.
You are respecting the critical thinking process. Every steps are easily understandable and clear. All of them have a purpose and are based on information. These points are also conclued and you think about the implications behind them.
Best regards,
Matthieu Denizot